<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NCSD 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ncsd2009.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ncsd2009.com</link>
	<description>Meeting of the ANS Nuclear Criticality Safety Division</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nuclear Criticality Safety: Realism, Robustness and the Nuclear Renaissance</title>
		<link>http://www.ncsd2009.com/?p=1</link>
		<comments>http://www.ncsd2009.com/?p=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ncsd2009.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richland, Washington USA
September 13-17, 2009
Realism and Criticality Safety:

Critical Experiments
Modeling Assumptions
Accident scenarios
Safety Margin
Industry Lessons Learned
Nuclear Data and Benchmark Selection

Robustness in Controls:

Development of Criticality Controls
Requirements and Standards role
Implementation of Criticality Controls
Double Contingency
International experience
New 10CFR70 Subpart H

Ready for the Renaissance: 

Status and scope of GNEP and New Enrichment Facilities


Criticality safety needs for the fuel cycle (enrichment, fabrication, transportation, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richland, Washington USA<br />
September 13-17, 2009</p>
<p><strong><em>Realism</em></strong> and Criticality Safety:</p>
<ul>
<li>Critical Experiments</li>
<li>Modeling Assumptions</li>
<li>Accident scenarios</li>
<li>Safety Margin</li>
<li>Industry Lessons Learned</li>
<li>Nuclear Data and Benchmark Selection</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><em>Robustness</em></strong> in Controls:</p>
<ul>
<li>Development of Criticality Controls</li>
<li>Requirements and Standards role</li>
<li>Implementation of Criticality Controls</li>
<li>Double Contingency</li>
<li>International experience</li>
<li>New 10CFR70 Subpart H</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><em>Ready for the Renaissance</em></strong><em>: </em></p>
<ul>
<li>Status and scope of GNEP and New Enrichment Facilities</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Criticality safety needs for the fuel cycle (enrichment, fabrication, transportation, storage and disposal)</li>
<li>Harvesting existing benchmark data (fuel cycle and nuclear data)</li>
<li>In-situ measurements</li>
<li>Criticality safety and engineering design</li>
<li>Use of computerized control systems</li>
<li>People needs, training and education</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ncsd2009.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
